Do you have a question? Want to learn more about our products and solutions, the latest career opportunities, or our events? We're here to help. Get in touch with us.
Customers are increasingly arriving at service interactions armed with AI-generated research, contract analysis and negotiation strategies, shifting the knowledge dynamic that contact centres have relied on for decades.
A new category of "armed customer" is emerging, one that moves through the AI literacy spectrum faster than most organisations, with implications for how demand takes shape and how frontline teams need to be equipped.
Understanding how customer AI literacy is evolving, and where it's heading next, is a necessary first step toward adapting operations before the gap becomes unmanageable.
The knowledge advantage that service organisations have long relied on is eroding. We spoke to Dustin Laidsaar, Associate Director of Customer Experience (CX) at Datacom, about what's driving this shift, what it looks like in practice, and what CX leaders should be thinking about now
Imagine a scenario where you find yourself in a dispute with a car dealership. A vehicle you ordered arrives months late and with the wrong interior colour. When you try to negotiate a resolution, the dealer cites contract penalties and logistical barriers. A few years ago, you probably would have accepted that position, because the alternative meant engaging a lawyer or seeking professional advice – something that may have seemed too time-consuming, expensive and uncertain.
But now, you have the option to feed the purchase agreement into a generative AI tool. Within seconds, you receive a breakdown of your contractual position, specific clause references and a clear indication that the penalty threat may not hold up. When you call the dealer back, you are no longer relying on instinct or frustration. You can calmly walk through the relevant clauses and challenge the position on its own terms.
By the end of the conversation, the dealer offers free paint protection and leather treatment to keep the deal alive. A free AI tool and thirty seconds of preparation has completely rebalanced a conversation that was designed to go one way. And that's not a fabricated example – that all happened to me.
My experience might sound unusual, but the data suggests it's becoming commonplace. Recent research suggests more than half of all consumers now use some form of generative AI to research products and services before contacting an organisation. My 70-ish-year-old mother-in-law uses ChatGPT to research purchases, and fact check salespeople. We're well past the early adopter phase.
What's emerging is a spectrum of AI-literate customers, and each stage presents different challenges for the organisations they interact with.
At the earlier end, people are using AI to summarise terms and conditions, translate complex policies into plain language, or compare options across providers. Functionally, this is similar to what people have always done with search engines – just faster and more synthesised.
Further along, customers are using AI to draft complaint letters, build negotiation strategies, and identify regulatory obligations or contractual weaknesses before they pick up the phone. They arrive at conversations with preparation that frequently outpaces the agent at the other end of the line. The AI coaches them on what to say, what to push back on, and when to escalate.
At the far end, AI agents are beginning to contact organisations directly on behalf of customers. A colleague of mine was told recently that an insurance company had flagged a wave of autonomous AI agents calling to obtain quotes. Whether those represent legitimate customer delegation or something more concerning, the operational effect is the same: calls are arriving from non-human entities that contact centres weren't built to handle.
Many organisations have adopted a narrative in which AI handles more, humans handle less, and the contact centre shrinks in a clean line. The reality is more complicated.
AI does remove simpler volume. Estimates suggest 20% to 40% of interactions can shift to automation. But removing friction from customer preparation creates what I'd call latent demand. Thousands of customers right now have small issues they never pursue because the effort of calling isn't worth it. When AI makes it effortless to understand a problem and articulate a complaint, that demand surfaces rather than disappearing.
I've seen this pattern before in a different form. Years ago, a bank I worked at made credit card transactions visible in real time. Call volume doubled overnight. Customers who would never have noticed a pre-authorisation buried in a monthly statement were suddenly calling about every unfamiliar charge. Reducing the barrier to knowledge didn't reduce contacts. It created demand that had always existed but never materialised.
The same dynamic is playing out now. As customers become more AI-literate, the volume of informed, specific, action-oriented contacts will grow, and the nature of those contacts will differ from what most organisations are currently staffed and trained for.
The biggest challenge in responding to this shift is one of awareness. Most organisations I speak with haven't yet started the conversation about what happens when their customers' AI literacy outpaces their own.
Audit your knowledge currency
Go to ChatGPT or another generative AI tool and ask about your organisation, your products, your complaints history, your competitors. What comes back is what your customers are seeing before they call. Compare it with what your agents have access to internally and look at where the gap sits.
Understand demand before automating it
The intrinsic reason someone makes contact matters more than the IVR path they arrived through. As customer AI literacy grows, the shape of demand will shift in ways that current automation business cases don't account for. Investing in understanding the "why" behind contacts provides a better foundation for deciding what to automate and what to reinforce.
Stress test for AI-informed contacts
Model what happens when 10-20% of contacts arrive pre-armed with AI-generated research, policies and negotiation strategies. What does that do to handle times, escalation rates and first-contact resolution? Most organisations haven't accounted for this variable because until recently it didn't need to be one.
The organisations that navigate this shift well won't be the ones that deploy the most technology the fastest. They'll be the ones that recognised early enough the need to rethink how they equip their people, structure their knowledge, and plan for a type of demand that didn't exist two years ago.
